30 Cri.Appeals 516, 281 n 468 of 2012.odt rt informed him that he was in company. Then Vivek asked him C ou when would he return home. Aniket told him that there was major fault in the machine and he would be late in returning home. 23. It is further stated by PW­1 Vivek that on the next day at around 05:30 am Aniket rang the door bell of his house. He ig h opened the door. Thereafter, Aniket went to sleep in a room. PW­1 Vivek also went to sleep in his room. According to Vivek at sleeping. H around 08:45 am he left the home for office. That time Aniket was At 09:30 am he received phone call from Aniket PW­1 Vivek then ba y informing that his sister Mansi was raped. rushed to the house of Aniket. He saw people gathered near his house. He also saw that both the hands of Mansi were tied with om wire of headphone and legs were tied with clothes. He could see bleeding injuries on her neck and blood on the bed­sheets. Many B household articles were lying scattered in the room. Police had already reached the house. Accused have not cross­examined PW­1 Vivek and we do not find any reason to disbelieve his testimony. 24. PW­2 Vaishali Vivek Khadke used to provide tiffin to Aniket and Mansi. She was residing in front of Purwa Apartment. ::: Uploaded on - 08/03/2016 ::: Downloaded on - 13/03/2016 19:36:28 :::