39 According to Sheetal in 2009 Mansi called her on rt 35. Cri.Appeals 516, 281 n 468 of 2012.odt C ou phone and told her that she wanted to purchase a mobile phone. This happened before 15 days of incident. Sheetal stated that both then went to Nirala Bazaar, 'Z' Corner at Aurangabad. Mansi purchased a mobile phone of Soni Erickson company having The model of ig h simcard of Vodafone company for Rs.7,000/­. mobile phone was G­502. After purchasing mobile Mansi was H given a receipt. Sheetal identified receipt Exhibit 39 and mobile phone seized in the crime from Accused No.2 Pradip Chandaliya Witness ba y as the same mobile which was purchased by Mansi. Sheetal has not been cross­examined by Accused persons. 36. Prosecution had examined PW­11 Amirkhan a Panch om on seizure of mobile from Accused No.2 Pradip Chandaliya, but this witness did not support the prosecution and his evidence B needs to be kept out of consideration. 37. Another witness Assistant Police Inspector Gautam Keshav Patare (PW­20) was attached to Jinsi Police Station at the relevant time. He conducted investigation in the case. On 21st June, 2009, A.P.I. Patare received information that stolen mobile ::: Uploaded on - 08/03/2016 ::: Downloaded on - 13/03/2016 19:36:28 :::