(31) 9) Whether the prosecution S.C.No.463/2009 (Judgment) has further : No. proved that on same dates and at the same time at Aurangabad, accused Nos.2 & 3 by name Pradeep Chandalia and Ram Bodkhe, doshonestly retained the Erikson received and stolen property i.e. Sony Mobile and gold ring of Mansi Deshpande and Aniket Deshpande,having reason to believe that the same has been transferred by committing dacoity? 10) Whether the prosecution has further proved that : Proved against after 12.6.2009 at accused Ram Aurangabad accused Nos. 2 & 3 by Bodkhe only. name Pradeep Chandalia and Ram Bodkhe voluntarily assisted in concealing the property i.e. Sony Erikson Mobile and gold ring which they knew or had reason to believe to be stolen property?