(50)
S.C.No.463/2009 (Judgment)
instance by P.I.Shri Bagul.
84/
The evidence of Amir Khan s/o Gaffar Khan, Mukram Khan s/o Abdul
Khan, Hidayat Khan s/o Feroz Khan, Afroz Khan s/o Feroz Khan, Asif Khan s/o
Mohmmad Akbar, Mohammad Mobin s/o Mohammad Abbas was adduced, so far as
the aforesaid seizure of clothes, gold ring and Simcard in the mobile phone of
Mansi are concerned. These witnesses do not support the prosecution on some
material particulars and therefore, learned APP cross examined them with the
permission of the Court. In that cross examination, some of them have admitted
certain facts and some of them have denied.
85/
But so far as the said recovery is concerned, the prosecution has
adduced the evidence of investigating officer by name Police Inspector Shri Borse
(Exh134, PW32).
86/
At the outset, it would not be out of place to mention that API Shri
Borse was not having any enmity against accused Jawed and accused Ram Bodkhe.
No such enmity is brought on record by way of his cross examination so as to infer
that he had adduced false evidence. So, he is equally competent witness about the
Select target paragraph3
Connect to a paragraph
Connect to an entity
Disable highlights
Add to table of contents