33 Cri.Appeals 516, 281 n 468 of 2012.odt rt It is stated by PW­5 Dr. Mali that articles in the house C ou were scattered. He saw hands of Mansi tied with wire and legs tied with clothes. He also noticed profused bleeding around her neck. He could gather from the circumstances that it was a case of murder and so he expressed his inability to examine Mansi and ig h told Aniket to call Police before touching the body of Mansi. Aniket asked him that he had already informed the Police and requested PW­5 Dr. Mali to see whether there is any chance of H survival of Mansi. On the request of Aniket, he examined Mansi and found that her respiratory system and pulses were not ba y functioning. Body was stiff. PW­5 Dr. Mali told Aniket that Mansi was no more. PW­5 Dr. Mali confirms the factual position in the room as per the photographs Exhibit 35/4 and 35/5. Accused did om not cross­examine this witness. B 27. The next witness Shobhana Deelip Patil (PW­9) was the owner from whom Aniket sought permission to climb the staircase to go to his house. She stated that on 12 th June, 2009 at around 11:15 am Aniket came to her house and asked her son Abhikshekh that he was not having the key of his flat and wanted to go to his flat through their iron ladder. Abhikshekh allowed him ::: Uploaded on - 08/03/2016 ::: Downloaded on - 13/03/2016 19:36:28 :::