(24) S.C.No.463/2009 (Judgment) purpose, learned APP Shri Mugadiya has relied on the ratio laid down by Hon'ble Bombay High Court in the case of “Nazar Mohammad s/o Hayat Mohammad Shaikh v. State of Maharashtra, reported in 2002 (2) B CR C 881”. 52/­ APP Shri Mugadiya has also relied on other two ratios regarding its identification parade and regarding false plea. But in the honest opinion of this Court, these ratios cannot be applicable to the facts of this case. Learned APP Shri Mugadiya has also relied on the ratio in the case of “Animireddy Venkataraman & Ors v. Public Prosecutor, H.C of A.P”, which clarifies that the FIR not meant to be encyclopedic. While considering the effect of some omissions in FIR, on the part of informant, Court should consider the probable physical and mental condition of the first informant. 53/­ In the light of said ratio, APP Shri Mugadiya has argued that even though Aniket Deshpande has not mentioned about the theft of gold ring, his clothes ,cash amount and mobile phone of Mansi in FIR while looking to his mental condition that fact may not be taken so strictly.