(44) S.C.No.463/2009 (Judgment) mobile in January, 2009. So, Mansi had purchased that mobile and after the incident, said mobile was missing along with gold ring, clothes of Aniket and along with cash of Rs.450/­. So, the prosecution has established the theft of these articles also beyond doubt. 80/­ Second set of evidence adduced by the prosecution witnesses consists of the evidence of Police Constable Shri Ravindra Bahule and the evidence of API Gautam Patare as per Exh­74 & 75. It appears from the evidence of these witnesses that they were the members of the squad, formed by P.I. Borse for the investigation of said crime bearing No.65/2009. They had received the IMEI number of the mobile phone of Mansi and then after it seems from the evidence of P.C.Ravindra Bahule that Police had received an information that the stolen mobile was brought in use in Maheshnagar area, in hotel “Pancham”. Therefore, they had gone there with panchas and one person i.e. accused Pradip was sitting near the counter. When Pradip was asked about said mobile possessed by him, he produced one mobile of Sony Erikson Company, having G­502 model. It also seems from the evidence of P.C. Bahule that Pradip told them that accused Javed Khan is daily customer and the