(67)
111/
S.C.No.463/2009 (Judgment)
Therefore aforesaid C.A. Report categorically discloses that on the Bed
sheet, as well as on the seized T shirt of accused Jawed the same blood having blood
group “AB” of Mansi was noticed by the Chemical Analyzer. The DNA test reports
also categorically prove the presence of accused Jawed at the house of Mansi on the
date of incident. Hence if the evidence of all the prosecution witnesses and more
specifically if the evidence of PW1 to 10, that of Medical Officers Dr. Heena Khan
and Dr. Mugdalimath, that of Police Constable Shri Bahule and API Shri Patare and
that of the evidence of Police Inspector Shri Borse is read along with these
C.A.reports and D.N.A.Test reports, then certainly it can be concluded that on the
date of incident, accused Javed had entered into the house of Mansi with an
intention to commit theft. It also appears and it can be concluded that Mansi might
have resisted the accused and therefore, he committed rape on her and then within
the help of scissor and screw driver, he committed the murder of Mansi by removing
mobile phone, gold ring, clothes of Aniket and cash of Rs.450/ from her house.
That is why towards the arrears of bill of hotel Pancham he handed over said mobile
phone to accused No.2 Pradeep Chandaliya and hence API Shri Patare had seized
Select target paragraph3
Connect to a paragraph
Connect to an entity
Disable highlights
Add to table of contents