(69) S.C.No.463/2009 (Judgment) nobody else. Therefore, I am of the opinion that the prosecution has succeeded in proving the charges levelled against accused of the offences punishable under Sections 302,392 r/w 397, 376,201,456,457,458 of IPC. Hence points No.1 to 7 are answered accordingly. As to points No.8 to 12:­ 113/­ It is also the case of prosecution and it appears from the evidence of witnesses on behalf of prosecution that accused Jawed gave the stolen mobile to accused Pradeep Chandaliya towards the payment of bill and he handed over the gold ring to accused Ram Bodkhe towards the expenses incurred by Ram Bodkhe on accused Javed. It is case of prosecution that accused Nos.2 & 3 concealed accused Javed. Therefore, prosecution has contended that the accused Nos.2 & 3 have committed offences under Sections 411,412,414,109 and 212 of Indian Penal Code. It is also the case of prosecution that accused Nos.2 & 3 had helped accused No.1 and they had hidden accused No.1 in hotel “Pancham” knowingly that he had committed said crime. However, so far as this crime is concerned, no cogent and reliable evidence has been adduced by the prosecution and even on the basis of the evidence adduced by the prosecution, it is rather difficult to hold that accused Nos.2 & 3 had