(78) S.C.No.463/2009 (Judgment) hide said muddemal and on the contrary, he produced it before Police. Hence offence under Section 414 of IPC is not proved against accused Pradeep Chandaliya. Hence my answers to point Nos. 8 to 12 are accordingly. 129/­ Accused Jawed @ Tingrya is heard on the point of sentence. He has submitted that he is of young age and earlier to this offence, no offence was registered against him under Section 302 of IPC. Hence, accused Jawed has prayed to take lenient view while awarding punishment. 130/­ Advocate Shri Mote on behalf of accused Jawed has also argued on the same lines and further he has submitted that looking towards the age of accused Jawed, there are every chances of improvement in him. Advocate Shri Mote has also submitted that this being the first offence of the accused, capital punishment may not be imposed and therefore, he has also prayed to take lenient view. 131/­ Accused Pradip Chandaliya and accused Ram Bodkhe are also heard on the point of sentence. They have submitted to take lenient view and according to them, this is their first offence. Hence both of them have submitted that they may not be sentenced to suffer rigorous imprisonment.