[2010] 4 MLJ A B Low Kian Boon & Anor v Public Prosecutor (Heliliah FCJ) 437 They proceeded to Wing Hing’s house. SP18 testified at Wing Hing’s house he slept in the living room but, before he slept, he overheard Dexter telling Wing Hing, that he, together with Jimmy, had killed the father of some person. SP18 testified that, on the way to Wing Hing’s house from the Shell petrol station, he had seen the clothes worn by Dexter and Jimmy. He testified that he saw blood marks on the shirt of Dexter and Jimmy. Under examination-in-chief SP18 testified, inter alia: C D E F G H I Saya ada nampak pakaian Dexter dan Jimmy sewaktu balik ke rumah Wing Hing dari stesen minyak Shell. Dexter pakai T-shirt. Saya tidak ingat warna T-shirt tersebut. Dia memakai seluar jeans berwarna biru gelap. Saya nampak kesan darah pada pakaian Dexter — iaitu di atas T-shirt. Buat kali pertama saya nampak T-shirt Dexter mempunyai darah semasa kami berada di stesen minyak Shell USJ 1. Semasa Dexter sampai di rumah Wing Hing, Wing Hing telah memberi sehelai baju kepada Dexter untuk tukar. Saya juga ada nampak pakaian Jimmy sewaktu di stesen minyak Shell. Jimmy memakai sehelai T-shirt tetapi saya tidak ingat warnanya. Beliau memakai sehelai seluar panjang dan saya juga tidak ingat warnanya. T-shirt Jimmy juga mempunyai kesan darah. Pada hari itu Jimmy ada pakai cermin mata. … Selama saya berkenalan dengan Dexter saya tidak bermusuh dengan beliau. Saya juga tidak bermusuh dengan Jimmy. [9] SP28 who performed the post mortem testified that the deceased had 23 injuries on his body almost all of them confined to the upper part of the body. Injury No 11 was a gaping deep incised wound 17cm long placed horizontally on the upper back of neck and his wound had cut the underlying second and third crucial vertebrae and also the spinal cord completely cut. Injury No 11 by itself could lead to death and also the other injuries that were found could have collectively caused the death. Injury No 11 is necessarily a fatal injury and the rest are fatal in the ordinary course of nature. According to SP28 all the cut wounds were caused by a sharp-cutting, long-bladed weapon and in his opinion, a classical weapon of that nature would be a parang. Exhibit P22 was shown to him and he testified that it is a very heavy, sharp, long, straight bladed weapon and is a weapon likely to have caused all the injuries on the deceased. SP28 also testified that the cause of death is multiple cut wound to head and neck. [10] Since one of the major complaints raised in this appeal is against the findings of facts, the statements of the HC judge that a case has been established against both appellants are quoted verbatim: At the close of the prosecution’s case, upon a careful examination of all the evidence produced by the prosecution and the evaluation of the credibility of the witnesses, notwithstanding some apparent inconsistency in the evidence of some witnesses in the