Abuchi Ngwoke v Public Prosecutor (Kamardin Hashim JCA) [2016] 2 MLJ 629 Mahkamah Rayuan Gobinath Reddy a/l Gopal v Pendakwa Raya [2014] 1 MLJ 446). Oleh sedemikian, saya menerima keterangan SP3 tersebut yang telah membuktikan subjek yang dipersoalkan adalah dadah jenis methamphetamine seberat 251.66g. A … B 41 Adalah suatu fakta yang tidak dapat dinafikan bahawa kuantiti seberat 251.66g methamphetamine berbalut plastik yang ditelan oleh Tertuduh tidak dapat dicerna melalui sistem penghadaman perut manusia. Ini telah menyokong anggapan statutori s 37(da) ADB bahawa tertuduh membawa jumlah dadah tersebut untuk tujuan pengedaran dan bukan untuk kegunaannya sendiri. 42 Berdasarkan fakta-fakta yang dibuktikan di atas dan setelah saya menimbangkan keterangan yang dikemukakan oleh pendakwaan pada tahap penilaian maksimum di akhir kes pendakwaan, saya mendapati bahawa pihak pendakwaan telah berjaya membuktikan kes prima facie terhadap Tertuduh (lihat kes Balachandran v Public Prosecutor [2005] 2 MLJ 301; [2005] 1 CLJ 85; Looi Kow Chai & Anor v Public Prosecutor [2003] 2 MLJ 65; [2003] 1 CLJ 734). 43 Oleh yang sedemikian, mahkamah ini memerintahkan agar Tertuduh dipanggil untuk membela diri atas pertuduhan yang dipertuduhkan (P3B). C D E [7] The appellant was thus called upon to enter his defence. F THE DEFENCE G [8] The appellant chose to give evidence under oath. In essence his defence was that he had no knowledge that the capsules he swallowed contained dangerous drugs. He said that he was a student at Bostonweb College of Technology and Management, Kuala Lumpur since 2010. In May 2012, he came back to Malaysia to continue his study in English language at the same college. H I [9] The appellant further said that before departure, he went to see his friend, Chibike, in a hotel room in Lagos. In the said room he had a drink with Chibike before he became drunk. Chibike asked him to swallow precious stone to be delivered to someone in Malaysia. He swallowed many precious stones given to him by Chibike. [10] It was further the evidence of the appellant that at the KLIA he boarded a taxi to go to Nilai Lagenda College to meet up with his friend, Mr Good Luck, but instead the taxi driver took him to Melaka. He had an argument with