Previous 4 / 16 Next

4. Menetapkan supaya Terpidana dihebani biaya perkara sebesar Rp 2.500,00: Membaca putusan Pengadilar, Negeri Palembang No. 550/Pid.8/2001/PN.PLG. tanggal 06 September 2001 yang amar Iengkapnyk sebagai berikut Menyatakan Terdakwa: MGS. ZAINAL ABIDIN bin MGS. MAHMUD BADARUDDIN terbukti secara sah dan meyakinkan bersalah atas kejahatan "TANPA HAK DAN MELAWAN HUKUM MENERIMA NARKOTIKA GOLONGAN!": Menjatuhkan pidana terhadap Terdakwa tersebut di atas dengan pidana penjara selama 18 (delapan belas) tahun dan denda sebesar Rp 5.000.000,00 (lima juta rupiah) subdiair 6 (enam) bulan kurungan Me•netapkan bahwa pidana yang dijatuhkan akan dikurangi dengh Iamanya Terdakwa herada dalam tahanan dengan $rintah Terdakwa tetap dalam tahanan; Memerintahkan agar barang bukti berupa: (tiga) karung ganja kering seberat 58,7 kg dirampas untuk dimusnahkan (satu) buah Hand Phone merk Motorolla V 2088 No. 0816381784; (dua) buah timbangan dudukidacin dan ig tunal sejumlah Rp 3.345.700,00 (tiga juta tiga ratus empat puluh i ribu tujuh ratus rupiah) dirampas untuk kepentingan Negara; ukum Terdakwa untuk membayar biaya perkara sebesar Rp 2.500,00 (dua ribu lima ratus rupiah); Membaca putusan Pengadilan Tinggi Palembang No. 184/PID/2001/PT.PLG. tanggal 03 Desember 2001 yang amar Iengkapnya sebagai berikut: Menerirna permohonan banding dan Terdakwa; Memperbaiki putusan Pengadilan Negeri Palembang tanggal 06 September 2001 No. 550/PID.B/2001/PN.PLG, sehingga seluruhnya berbunyi sebagai berikut: 1. Menyatakan Terdakwa : MGS. ZAINAL ABIDIN bin MGS. MAHMUD BADARUDDIN terbukti secara sah dan rneyakinkan bersalah atas kejahatan : "Tanpa hak dan melawan hukum menyalurkan, menjual dan menerima Narkotika Golongan I"; 2: Menjatuhkan pidana terhadap Terck%kwa tersebut dengan pidana mati dan denda sebesar Rp 5.000.000,00 (lima juta rupiah) subsidair 6 bulan kurungan Hal. 4dari 16 hal. Put. No.65 PIVPID.SUS/2015

Select target paragraph3

● ● ●

Mgs. Zainal Abidin Bin Mgs. Mahmud Badarudin

CASE BRIEF

Jurisdiction

Indonesia

Nationalities

Indonesian

Case Title: Mgs. Zainal Abidin Bin Mgs. Mahmud Badarudin

Age at Offence: 36

Age Group at Offence: Adult (18 to 59)

Gender: Male

Religious Group at Offence: Islam

Jurisdiction - Geolocation

Latitude: -6.293782809685137

Longitude: 106.84001863002779

Jurisdiction - Geolocation (linked CASE BRIEF): Indonesia

Contributing TRP Partner

Institute for Criminal Justice and Reform (Indonesia)

Latest Country's Death Penalty Status

Retentionist

Case Current Status: Closed: Executed

Year when sentenced to Death Row: 2000s: 2001

Method of Execution: Firing/Shooting: Squad

Rights Allegedly Violated

Fair Trial and Due Process: Fair investigation & fair disclosure
Fair Trial and Due Process: Right to appeal
Torture: Torture/Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (CIDT)

Nature of Offences for Death Penalty

Drug Crime

Case Background (300 words max): MGS. Zainal Abidin bin MGS. Mahmud Badaruddin is an Indonesian citizen who was arrested by the Police for buying and selling marijuana in December 2000. Initially, the defendant bought 3 sacks of marijuana weighing 58.7 kilograms, then he sold it back to several people, but the defendant's actions were eventually known by members of the Police. This case reaped irregularities because at the appeal and cassation level trials, the defendant was sentenced to death accompanied by a fine of Rp 5,000,000.00 (five million rupiah). However, in the end, the panel of judges at the judicial review level annulled the verdict by eliminating the criminal fine because the defendant had been sentenced to death.

Defence Arguments (200 words max.): Zainal's legal counsel, during the first-instance trial, defended against the public prosecutor's charges by arguing that the prosecutor disregarded the presumption of innocence. In the indictment, Zainal was imperatively accused of "selling and buying marijuana," even though this was not mentioned in any identification. The counsel also argued that the prosecutor's indictment was vague and imprecise, tending to be a form of fabrication and manipulation. Furthermore, the prosecutor did not specify in detail when, where, and how Zainal ordered and purchased the marijuana. At the cassation stage, Zainal's legal counsel presented claims of torture, stating, "Even during the defendant's examination, the defendant denied the Examination Report (BAP), asserting that it was merely a fabrication. This was because, when the BAP was made on December 21, 2000, the defendant had already been beaten and intimidated by investigators to prevent physical marks, which led the defendant to fabricate the story."

Judgement with Headnotes (200 words max): On the claim that there was coercion in the Examination Report (BAP) experienced by the defendant, the panel of judges did not accept the claim of torture because the investigator testified that he did not coerce the defendant in obtaining information.

Legal Representation Received

Pre-trial: Unknown
Trial: Unknown
Appeal: Unknown
Second Appeal: Unknown

Legislation Related to the Offence(s): The Law No. 22 of 1997 on Narcotics

Case Brief Entry Status: Complete

Language of Case Materials

Bahasa Indonesia

Is the case brief featured?: Yes

Primary Documents

First Instance Judgement - MGS Zainal Abidin bin MGS. Mahmud Badaruddin
Indonesian
Download View
Appeal Judgement - MGS Zainal Abidin bin MGS. Mahmud Badaruddin
Indonesian
Download View
Cassation Judgement - MGS Zainal Abidin bin MGS. Mahmud Badaruddin
Indonesian
Download View
Case Review Judgement - MGS Zainal Abidin bin MGS. Mahmud Badaruddin
Indonesian
Download View

Death Penalty Defence - Asia

Select target paragraph3

Mgs. Zainal Abidin Bin Mgs. Mahmud Badarudin

Primary Documents

Notifications