25 Cri.Appeals 516, 281 n 468 of 2012.odt rt smothering could be possible by shutting the mouth and nostrils C ou by palm. 15. The entire evidence of Dr. Mugadalimath and Dr.Sachin Gade is most natural and believable as Accused did not dispute the genuineness of postmortem report and further No.1 Jawedkhan though cross­examined ig h Accused Dr.Mugadalimath, could not bring on record anything adverse 16. In addition to medical evidence, prosecution has relied uncontroverted inquest panchanama (Exhibit 31), ba y upon H affecting the reliability of medical evidence. photographs (Exhibits 35/1 to 35/5) of the spot taken by PW­3 B om Baburao Sitaram Batade and spot panchanama (Exhibit 29). 17. So far as inquest panchanama is concerned, PW­32 P.I. Borse deposed that P.S.I. Akmal had drawn inquest Panchanama (Exhibit 31) and seized various articles from the spot vide seizure Panchanama (Exhibit 30). Accused have not disputed genuineness of inquest Panchanama (Exhibit 31). From inquest panchanama it can be seen that multiple injuries were found on the dead body of Mansi. ::: Uploaded on - 08/03/2016 ::: Downloaded on - 13/03/2016 19:36:28 :::

Select target paragraph3

Connect to a paragraph
Connect to an entity
Disable highlights
Add to table of contents