31
Cri.Appeals 516, 281 n 468 of 2012.odt
rt
She stated that on 12th June, 2009 at around 09:00 am she heard
C
ou
that Mansi was murdered. She had gone to the house of Mansi
and learnt that mobile phone, gold ring, cash and pant of brother
of Mansi were stolen. Mansi was student. From the evidence of
PW2 Vaishali it can be seen that Aniket and Mansi only two
ig
h
persons were residing in the house and incident of theft and
murder had taken place. This witness was not crossexamined by
25.
H
the Accused.
Next important witness is PW4 Shanta Rameshwar
ba
y
Soni to whom Aniket had rushed for help after seeing Mansi lying
injured in pool of blood. According to PW4 Shanta Soni on 12 th
June, 2009 at around 05:30 am she opened the door of her
om
house. She saw Aniket knocking the door of his house. She
asked Aniket not to knock the door as his sister would get up.
B
Aniket told PW4 Mrs. Soni that he returned home after attending
night duty in the office. PW4 Mrs. Soni told Aniket that he should
wait for some time as Mansi might be sleeping. She asked Aniket
to sit in her house and went for plucking flowers. PW4 Mrs. Soni
stated that when she returned after collecting flowers she saw that
Aniket was not in her house. She thought that Mansi might have
::: Uploaded on - 08/03/2016
::: Downloaded on - 13/03/2016 19:36:28 :::
Select target paragraph3
Connect to a paragraph
Connect to an entity
Disable highlights
Add to table of contents