31 Cri.Appeals 516, 281 n 468 of 2012.odt rt She stated that on 12th June, 2009 at around 09:00 am she heard C ou that Mansi was murdered. She had gone to the house of Mansi and learnt that mobile phone, gold ring, cash and pant of brother of Mansi were stolen. Mansi was student. From the evidence of PW­2 Vaishali it can be seen that Aniket and Mansi only two ig h persons were residing in the house and incident of theft and murder had taken place. This witness was not cross­examined by 25. H the Accused. Next important witness is PW­4 Shanta Rameshwar ba y Soni to whom Aniket had rushed for help after seeing Mansi lying injured in pool of blood. According to PW­4 Shanta Soni on 12 th June, 2009 at around 05:30 am she opened the door of her om house. She saw Aniket knocking the door of his house. She asked Aniket not to knock the door as his sister would get up. B Aniket told PW­4 Mrs. Soni that he returned home after attending night duty in the office. PW­4 Mrs. Soni told Aniket that he should wait for some time as Mansi might be sleeping. She asked Aniket to sit in her house and went for plucking flowers. PW­4 Mrs. Soni stated that when she returned after collecting flowers she saw that Aniket was not in her house. She thought that Mansi might have ::: Uploaded on - 08/03/2016 ::: Downloaded on - 13/03/2016 19:36:28 :::

Select target paragraph3

Connect to a paragraph
Connect to an entity
Disable highlights
Add to table of contents