7 Though, Mr. Pais tried to argue that this DNA report should not infirmities/ convinced be acted upon as irregularities with the said there therein, argument. are we The various are DNA not report which is a scientific report nails the appellant and clinchingly proves the charge against the appellant beyond reasonable doubt. We also find that the learned Sessions Judge as well as the High Court have examined these aspects in detail and in the light of the said various evidence witnesses as well have as the arrived depositions at the of aforesaid finding of fact which is without blemish. Therefore, insofar as the conviction of the appellant under the aforesaid provisions of the IPC is concerned, we uphold the same. Coming to the sentence, we find that the trial court had given detailed and cogent reasons while awarding life imprisonment to the appellant and came to the conclusion that it was not rarest of rare case which deserved death penalty. The High Court, on the other hand, has been swayed by the so-called previous criminal that the record of appellant the appellant. was involved It is in five mentioned offences relating to housebreaking and two offences of theft. In the first instance, it may be pointed out that in none of these cases the appellant had been convicted. Furthermore, the cases are of trivial nature which