(12) S.C.No.463/2009 (Judgment) frame charge under Sections 411,412,414,109 and 212 of IPC. Accordingly the learned Additional Sessions Judge had framed charge at Exh­13 under above sections against accused No.1 and charge under Sections 411,412,414,109 and 212 of IPC against accused Nos.2 & 3. 25/­ He explained the contents of the charge to all accused in Marathi which they know. Even accused No.1 Javed also knows Marathi language. All the accused pleaded not guilty to the charge levelled against them vide their plea at Exh­14,15 & 16 respectively, recorded in Marathi and English and all of them claimed to be tried. 26/­ From the line of cross examination as well as from the statements of all accused persons under Section 313 of Cri.P.C, their defence appears to be of total denial. 27/­ In order to prove its case, prosecution has adduced evidence of 33 witnesses. 27/­ In the light of the evidence adduced by panch witnesses regarding recovery of clothes of accused, clothes of informant Aniket Deshpande and gold ring, at the instance of accused Jawed and Ram Bodkhe is concerned, Advocate Shri