(23) S.C.No.463/2009 (Judgment) Mugadiya has relied on the ratio laid down by Hon'ble Bombay High Court in the case of “Gangadhar Nair v. State of Maharashtra, reported in 2001(2) B.Cr.C 525”. 49/­ Again learned APP Shri Mugadiya has argued that so far as recovery under Section 27 of the Evidence Act is concerned, the recovery of clothes would become an incriminating circumstance only if they contain blood or such other substance as would connect accused with crime. For this purpose, learned APP Shri Mugadiya has relied on the ratio laid down by Hon'ble Bombay High Court in the case of “ Kannayya @ Kanna Vishnu Vidhate v. State of Maharashtra, reported in 2010(1) B.Cr.C, 91.” 50/­ APP Shri Mugadiya has argued that in this case also blood­stained T shirt having blood of “AB” blood group of Mansi is recovered at the instance of accused Jawed which is incriminating circumstance against him. 51/­ APP Shri Mugadiya has argued that recording said recovery of blood­ stained T shirt from accused, he did not offer any explanation and therefore that itself is sufficient to prove his involvement in commission of crime. For this