(49) S.C.No.463/2009 (Judgment) said mobile and its IMEI number since 12.6.2009. But in order to trace out the real culprit, that information was kept secret by the Police, then it was but natural. The seizure of said mobile from accused No.2 was a major break through for the investigation of this crime because of which Police could trace out accused No.1 Jawed who seems to be the main culprit in this crime. 83/­ Third set of evidence adduced by the prosecution consists of evidence of panch witnesses before whom accused Jawed had given the statement regarding the production of his clothes which were on his person at the time of incident and also production of the clothes which were stolen by him from the house of informant Aniket. Similarly third set of evidence also consists of the evidence of panch witnesses before whom accused Ram Bodkhe gave statement regarding the recovery of gold ring which was given to him by accused Jawed towards the expenses incurred by him on accused Jawed and which was concealed by him in the electric motor room in Tulsi Chamber. Similarly, this set of evidence also consists of the evidence of panch witnesses before whom the Sim­card in the stolen mobile was kept by accused Jawed in the shutter of Tulsi chamber and it was recovered at his