(67) 111/­ S.C.No.463/2009 (Judgment) Therefore aforesaid C.A. Report categorically discloses that on the Bed sheet, as well as on the seized T shirt of accused Jawed the same blood having blood group “AB” of Mansi was noticed by the Chemical Analyzer. The DNA test reports also categorically prove the presence of accused Jawed at the house of Mansi on the date of incident. Hence if the evidence of all the prosecution witnesses and more specifically if the evidence of PW­1 to 10, that of Medical Officers Dr. Heena Khan and Dr. Mugdalimath, that of Police Constable Shri Bahule and API Shri Patare and that of the evidence of Police Inspector Shri Borse is read along with these C.A.reports and D.N.A.Test reports, then certainly it can be concluded that on the date of incident, accused Javed had entered into the house of Mansi with an intention to commit theft. It also appears and it can be concluded that Mansi might have resisted the accused and therefore, he committed rape on her and then within the help of scissor and screw driver, he committed the murder of Mansi by removing mobile phone, gold ring, clothes of Aniket and cash of Rs.450/­ from her house. That is why towards the arrears of bill of hotel Pancham he handed over said mobile phone to accused No.2 Pradeep Chandaliya and hence API Shri Patare had seized

Select target paragraph3

Connect to a paragraph
Connect to an entity
Disable highlights
Add to table of contents