Previous 56 / 56 Next

ep u b hk am Direktori Putusan Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia In do ne si a putusan.mahkamahagung.go.id R III. Menyatakan Terdakwa tetap berada dalam tahanan; ng IV. Membebankan kepada Terdakwa untuk membayar biaya perkara dalam dua tingkat pengadilan, yang dalam tingkat banding sebesar Rp.3.000,00 gu (tiga ribu rupiah) ; Demikian diputuskan dalam sidang permusyawaratan Majelis A Hakim Pengadilan Tinggi Jakarta pada hari Rabu tanggal 14 Juni 2017 ub lik ah oleh kami Hi SANWARI HA, S.H.,M.H., Hakim Tinggi selaku Ketua Majelis, Hj.ELNAWISAH,S.H.,M.H., dan I NYOMAN SUTAMA, S.H.,M.H., am masing-masing Penetapan Hakim Ketua Tinggi selaku Pengadilan Anggota, Tinggi yang DKI berdasarkan Jakarta, Nomor ep 103/Pid.Sus/2017/PT.DKI, tanggal 12 Mei 2017, ditunjuk selaku Majelis ah k Hakim untuk memeriksa dan mengadili perkara ini dalam Pengadilan banding, dan putusan mana diucapkan dalam sidang R tingkat yang In do ne si terbuka untuk umum pada hari Senin tanggal 19 Juni 2017 oleh Hakim A gu ng Ketua, dan Hakim-Hakim Anggota tersebut, dan dibantu oleh ANDI SYAMSIAR, SH.MH., Panitera Pengganti, tanpa dihadiri Penuntut Umum dan Terdakwa dan Penasihat Hukum; HAKIM KETUA , Hj. ELNAWISAH, S.H., M.H. Hi. A. SANWARI ,HA.S.H, M.H ub ep I. NYOMAN SUTAMA, S.H., M.H. , PANITERA PENGGANTI es on Ny. ANDI SYAMSIAR SH.MH hal 56 dari 56 hal Perkara No.103/PID/2017/PT.DKI In d A gu ng M R ah ka m lik ah HAKIM ANGGOTA : ik h Disclaimer Kepaniteraan Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia berusaha untuk selalu mencantumkan informasi paling kini dan akurat sebagai bentuk komitmen Mahkamah Agung untuk pelayanan publik, transparansi dan akuntabilitas pelaksanaan fungsi peradilan. Namun dalam hal-hal tertentu masih dimungkinkan terjadi permasalahan teknis terkait dengan akurasi dan keterkinian informasi yang kami sajikan, hal mana akan terus kami perbaiki dari waktu kewaktu. Dalam hal Anda menemukan inakurasi informasi yang termuat pada situs ini atau informasi yang seharusnya ada, namun belum tersedia, maka harap segera hubungi Kepaniteraan Mahkamah Agung RI melalui : Email : kepaniteraan@mahkamahagung.go.id Telp : 021-384 3348 (ext.318) Halaman 56

Select target paragraph3

● ● ●

Santa alias Aliang alias Akam

CASE BRIEF

Jurisdiction

Indonesia

Nationalities

Indonesian

Case Title: Santa alias Aliang alias Akam

Age at Offence: 43

Age Group at Offence: Adult (18 to 59)

Gender: Male

Religious Group at Offence: Other

Jurisdiction - Geolocation

Latitude: -6.293782809685137

Longitude: 106.84001863002779

Jurisdiction - Geolocation (linked CASE BRIEF): Indonesia

Contributing TRP Partner

Institute for Criminal Justice and Reform (Indonesia)

Latest Country's Death Penalty Status

Retentionist

Case Current Status: Closed: Reprieve by Executive

Year when sentenced to Death Row: 2010s: 2017

Method of Execution: Firing/Shooting: Squad

Rights Allegedly Violated

Fair Trial and Due Process: Excessive and disproportionate punishment
Fair Trial and Due Process: Fair investigation & fair disclosure
Torture: Torture/Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (CIDT)

Nature of Offences for Death Penalty

Drug Crime

Case Background (300 words max): The defendant, Santa alias Aliang alias Akam, was charged for participating in an international drug trafficking operation involving methamphetamine (shabu-shabu). Together with several other individuals, including foreign nationals and fugitives (DPO), the defendant played a role in coordinating logistics, accommodation, and transportation for the delivery and storage of 20 kilograms of methamphetamine hidden in machine moulds. These drugs were discovered in a Jakarta hotel and a warehouse in Tangerang, following a police raid on June 2, 2016. Santa's involvement included renting the warehouse, arranging accommodation, and assisting in receiving the imported goods.

Defence Arguments (200 words max.)

The legal counsel from LBH Masyarakat, during the hearing at the West Jakarta District Court, stated that the defendant had no knowledge of the narcotics contained in the package and merely acted as a logistical assistant, without criminal intent or awareness of any conspiracy. The defence emphasized the absence of direct evidence linking the defendant to the ownership or control of the narcotics, asserting that his role was limited to assisting with accommodation and transportation. Meanwhile, at the appeal level, the defendant’s legal counsel raised the following key arguments:

Key Evidence Withheld from Trial: One of the defendant’s mobile phones was seized and used as evidence; however, the co-accused's phone—which also contained crucial evidence—was never presented in court. The device allegedly held relevant conversations between the defendant and other suspects.
Failure to Address Irregularities: The defence argued that both the judges and prosecutors failed to seriously pursue the material truth and that the evidence presented by the Public Prosecutor was substantially flawed. This lack of effort undermined the fairness of the trial and should have been considered in assessing the defendant’s culpability.
Allegations of Torture: The defendant testified that he was subjected to physical abuse, including being struck with a hammer and having his eyes taped shut. The purpose of this alleged torture was to force a confession and implicate him in the narcotics trafficking scheme alongside other individuals.
Violations of Criminal Procedure:

The examination of police witnesses was repeatedly postponed—up to five times—at the prosecutor's request, which the defence argued violated the principle of a trial that should be "simple, swift, and low-cost."
Additionally, the defendant was not granted adequate time to prepare his written defence (plea), a fundamental right in the criminal justice process.

Judgement with Headnotes (200 words max): The court found the defendant guilty of conspiring to traffic Class I narcotics exceeding 5 grams, under Article 114(2) Jo. Article 132(1) of Law No. 35/2009 on Narcotics. The court held that the collective coordination and role-sharing among the parties, including Santa's direct logistical support, indicated conscious involvement in the trafficking operation. The sentence imposed reflected the seriousness of the crime and the large quantity of drugs involved.

Legal Representation Received

Appeal: Private
Trial: State Legal Aid
Pre-trial: Unknown

Legislation Related to the Offence(s): Law Number 35 of 2009 concerning Narcotics

Case Brief Entry Status: Complete

Language of Case Materials

Bahasa Indonesia

Primary Documents

Appeal Judgement - SANTA Alias ALIANG Alias AKAM.pdf
Indonesian
Download View
First Instance Judgement - SANTA Alias ALIANG Alias AKAM.pdf
Indonesian
Download View

Death Penalty Defence - Asia

Select target paragraph3

Santa alias Aliang alias Akam

Primary Documents

Notifications