10. The accused appellant was arrested on 3rd October 2013, vide arrest panchnama9 and he was subjected to medical examination. The Medical Officer (PW-10) of the Civil Hospital, Thane, found an abrasion on the foreskin of the penis of the accused appellant. The prosecution has tried to link the said injury with the crime, claiming that the injury may have been received when the accused appellant had sexually assaulted the child victim. 11. On the pointing out of the accused appellant, the Investigating Officer, Mandar Vasant Dharmadhikari (PW-18) claims to have visited room No. 2 (place of incident) and room No. 4 of the watchmen chawl, in which the accused appellant used to reside. A few articles were recovered and seized from room No. 4, to be specific, the lungi, baniyan, the watchman’s dress and the shoes of the 9 Exh. 82. 8 Criminal Appeal No(s). 1954-1955 of 2022

Select target paragraph3

Connect to a paragraph
Connect to an entity
Disable highlights
Add to table of contents