Previous 12 / 32 Next

- 12 - rnor 492 K/Kr/1981 tannal 8 Januari 1983. Oleh kareaa itu sun dc.kwaan JPU bataL (Jern]. hukum. Berdasarkan uraian diatas, karni Nohonkan aar sudiloh ki:anya memutuskan dsncan amar sebaLt berikut Jenyatakan Dakwaan Sdr. Jaksa Penuntut Umum Salah men2hadirkan 0- rangnya (ERROR IN SUBJECTO); i'enyatakan Bakwan Primair dan Subsidair tidak Cermat, Tid&c je las, dan ju&'a tidak 1encap, sehina berdasarkan 143 ayat (2) jo Fttso.1 143 ayxt (3) KUEL&P dan Ynrisprudensi 1iJ0LI ::o. 808 1-1/Pid/1904 tanggal 29 Juni 1985 harus dinyatakan Batal Ben , ! Flukurn Nernbebaska.n Terdakt daxi seada oentuk Penahanan ; Farnbebankan biaya yanR timbil dalarn perkara in! pada Negara 11eriirnbang, bahwajaksa Penuntut Umum telah membenikan penth1pat nya/tangtpannya atas keberatan tersebut diatas seba2aibeniku-t; Bahwa dalarn menyusun Surat Dakwaan kamiflo. 34/Rp.12/04/2001 tanggal 02 Apr11 2001 tersebut, telah kami sesuaikan dengan ke tentuan Undarg-Undang yaitu pasal 143 Undan2-Undang No.8 tahun 1981 yang ]azim disebut denin KDHAP. Baliwa clalarn penyelesaian pasal 143 KUHAP tidak dijelaskan so cara rinci. apa yang dinnksud den an jelas, cernat dan 1enkap. Uridang-Undan' No. 22 Tahun 1997 adalah Undang-Undan Tindak Pidana Khusuc, dimana Hukurn Eaterlil dan Hulcum Fdrndlnya men jadi satu dalam ketentuan Utdang-tTndang tersebut. Berdasarkau uraian seperti tersebut diatas sanrat1cth keliru ka].au âaudara Penaseliat !iukum terdakwa atas nnn Ups. Zainal - Abidin .................

Select target paragraph3

● ● ●

Mgs. Zainal Abidin Bin Mgs. Mahmud Badarudin

CASE BRIEF

Jurisdiction

Indonesia

Nationalities

Indonesian

Case Title: Mgs. Zainal Abidin Bin Mgs. Mahmud Badarudin

Age at Offence: 36

Age Group at Offence: Adult (18 to 59)

Gender: Male

Religious Group at Offence: Islam

Jurisdiction - Geolocation

Latitude: -6.293782809685137

Longitude: 106.84001863002779

Jurisdiction - Geolocation (linked CASE BRIEF): Indonesia

Contributing TRP Partner

Institute for Criminal Justice and Reform (Indonesia)

Latest Country's Death Penalty Status

Retentionist

Case Current Status: Closed: Executed

Year when sentenced to Death Row: 2000s: 2001

Method of Execution: Firing/Shooting: Squad

Rights Allegedly Violated

Fair Trial and Due Process: Fair investigation & fair disclosure
Fair Trial and Due Process: Right to appeal
Torture: Torture/Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (CIDT)

Nature of Offences for Death Penalty

Drug Crime

Case Background (300 words max): MGS. Zainal Abidin bin MGS. Mahmud Badaruddin is an Indonesian citizen who was arrested by the Police for buying and selling marijuana in December 2000. Initially, the defendant bought 3 sacks of marijuana weighing 58.7 kilograms, then he sold it back to several people, but the defendant's actions were eventually known by members of the Police. This case reaped irregularities because at the appeal and cassation level trials, the defendant was sentenced to death accompanied by a fine of Rp 5,000,000.00 (five million rupiah). However, in the end, the panel of judges at the judicial review level annulled the verdict by eliminating the criminal fine because the defendant had been sentenced to death.

Defence Arguments (200 words max.): Zainal's legal counsel, during the first-instance trial, defended against the public prosecutor's charges by arguing that the prosecutor disregarded the presumption of innocence. In the indictment, Zainal was imperatively accused of "selling and buying marijuana," even though this was not mentioned in any identification. The counsel also argued that the prosecutor's indictment was vague and imprecise, tending to be a form of fabrication and manipulation. Furthermore, the prosecutor did not specify in detail when, where, and how Zainal ordered and purchased the marijuana. At the cassation stage, Zainal's legal counsel presented claims of torture, stating, "Even during the defendant's examination, the defendant denied the Examination Report (BAP), asserting that it was merely a fabrication. This was because, when the BAP was made on December 21, 2000, the defendant had already been beaten and intimidated by investigators to prevent physical marks, which led the defendant to fabricate the story."

Judgement with Headnotes (200 words max): On the claim that there was coercion in the Examination Report (BAP) experienced by the defendant, the panel of judges did not accept the claim of torture because the investigator testified that he did not coerce the defendant in obtaining information.

Legal Representation Received

Pre-trial: Unknown
Trial: Unknown
Appeal: Unknown
Second Appeal: Unknown

Legislation Related to the Offence(s): The Law No. 22 of 1997 on Narcotics

Case Brief Entry Status: Complete

Language of Case Materials

Bahasa Indonesia

Is the case brief featured?: Yes

Primary Documents

First Instance Judgement - MGS Zainal Abidin bin MGS. Mahmud Badaruddin
Indonesian
Download View
Appeal Judgement - MGS Zainal Abidin bin MGS. Mahmud Badaruddin
Indonesian
Download View
Cassation Judgement - MGS Zainal Abidin bin MGS. Mahmud Badaruddin
Indonesian
Download View
Case Review Judgement - MGS Zainal Abidin bin MGS. Mahmud Badaruddin
Indonesian
Download View

Death Penalty Defence - Asia

Select target paragraph3

Mgs. Zainal Abidin Bin Mgs. Mahmud Badarudin

Primary Documents

Notifications