37 (III) (a) Cri.Appeals 516, 281 n 468 of 2012.odt Recovery of gold ring of Complainant at Accused No.1 had given gold ring to Accused No.3. (IV) Recovery of blood stained clothes of Accused No.1 at his instance. (V) C ou (b) rt the instance of Accused No.3. Discovery of clothes of Complainant in to the information ig h pursuance given by Accused No.1. (VI) Medical evidence showing that girl was (VII) H forcibly raped and then done to death. Motive. ba y (VIII) Failure of the Accused to offer plausible explanation to the incriminating circumstances om against him. B 32. (I) (a) Recovery of mobile of Mansi from Accused No.2. (b) Accused No.1 gave mobile to Accused No.2. As stated by Investigating Officer, P.I. Borse (PW­32) on 19th June, 2009 supplementary statement of Aniket was recorded. From the supplementary statement it was revealed that Mansi had purchased a mobile of Sony Erikson company. The ::: Uploaded on - 08/03/2016 ::: Downloaded on - 13/03/2016 19:36:28 :::