48 Cri.Appeals 516, 281 n 468 of 2012.odt 51. C ou used in the mobile seized from Pradeep Chandaliya. rt given by PW­26 Mayur to his father Pradip Chandaliya for being Further link in the circumstances has been established through the evidence of PW­32 P.I. Borse. P.I. Borse interrogated Pradip Chandaliya regarding possession of mobile. Pradip ig h Chandaliya told him that simcard was given to him by his son Mayur and mobile handset was given to him by Jawedkhan @ H Tingarya s/o Habib Khan a customer of his hotel towards the bill of hotel. P.I. Borse then interrogated Mayur who admitted that he ba y had given the simcard to his father for being used in the mobile handset. This evidence clearly establishes that while handing over mobile to Accused No.2 simcard was removed by Accused om No.1 Jawedkhan. 52. Now the crucial question which is to be answered is B regarding the simcard used by Mansi. In this connection P.I. Borse interrogated Accused Jawedkhan on 25th June, 2009. Accused Jawedkhan made a statement that original simcard in the mobile was kept by him in the shutter of godown of Tulsi Chamber behind Pancham hotel. The memorandum was drawn accordingly at Exhibit 54 and in pursuance to the information ::: Uploaded on - 08/03/2016 ::: Downloaded on - 13/03/2016 19:36:29 :::