40 Cri.Appeals 516, 281 n 468 of 2012.odt rt was in possession of owner of hotel Pancham. So along with C ou Panch witness and other staff he went to hotel Pancham on Jalna Road and gave information at the counter of hotel about purpose of his visit. 38. Accused No.2 Pradip Chandaliya was available on the possessing mobile. ig h counter. A.P.I. Patare asked Pradip Chandaliya whether he was Pradip Chandaliya told him that he was H having mobile handset of Soni Ericson company which was given to him by his customer Jawedkhan on 14th June, 2009 towards a ba y bill of hotel. Pradip Chandaliya also stated that simcard in the mobile was given to him by his son Mayur. Pradip Chandaliya handed over the mobile to A.P.l. Patare. It was seized under om Panchanama Exhibit 77. A.P.I. Patare identified the mobile and the simcard before the Court. The evidence of A.P.I. Patare is B consistent throughout and nothing otherwise could be elicited in his cross­examination to disbelieve his testimony. 39. In order to ascertain whether mobile seized from Accused No. 2 belonged to Mansi, reliance is also placed on the evidence of PW­18 Abdul Rauf and PW­24 Shaikh Nadeem. PW­18 Abdul Rauf Mohammad Yakub was running Zee Corner ::: Uploaded on - 08/03/2016 ::: Downloaded on - 13/03/2016 19:36:28 :::