50
He stated that in March 2008 he had attended
rt
department.
Cri.Appeals 516, 281 n 468 of 2012.odt
C
ou
birthday of Aniket and offered him a gold ring weighing 5½
grams. He purchased the gold ring from the shop of R.C.Bafna at
Aurangabad. He came to know that gold ring given by him to
Aniket was stolen. Police called him to identify the gold ring. He
given by him to Aniket.
This witness was crossexamined on identification of
H
55.
ig
h
went to Police Station and identified the gold ring as the same
gold ring. Damodhar stated that gold ring was containing name of
ba
y
R.C.Bafna and white imitation stone. Despite crossexamination
at length, evidence of Damodhar has remained unshaken and
consistent throughout.
No material omission or contradiction
om
could be brought in his crossexamination.
The testimony of
Damodhar thus inspires confidence.
B
56.
The next witness on recovery of gold ring is PW29
Ashok Kesharlal Chopra, Manager working in the shop of
R.C.Bafna.
This witness was examined to show that PW8
Damodhar had purchased gold ring from the shop of R.C.Bafna.
PW29 Ashok stated in his evidence that gold ring seized in the
crime was having monogram of their shop. The same was sold
::: Uploaded on - 08/03/2016
::: Downloaded on - 13/03/2016 19:36:29 :::
Select target paragraph3
Connect to a paragraph
Connect to an entity
Disable highlights
Add to table of contents