SCC Online Web Edition, © 2022 EBC Publishing Pvt. Ltd. Page 5 Monday, October 24, 2022 Printed For: Navami Krishnamurthy, Jindal Global University SCC Online Web Edition: http://www.scconline.com © 2022 EBC Publishing Pvt.Ltd., Lucknow. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 26. Letter to Reserve Inspector regarding deceased Km. Kajal [Ex. Ka-26] 27. Letter to C.M.O. regarding deceased Km. Kajal [Ex. Ka-27] 28. Inquest Report of deceased Km. Laxmi [Ex. Ka-28] 29. Photo lash of deceased Km. Laxmi [Ex. Ka-29] 30. Police Paper No. 13 of deceased Km. Laxmi [Ex. Ka-30] 31. Specimen seal regarding deceased Km. Laxmi [Ex. Ka-31] 32. Letter to Reserve Inspector regarding deceased Km. Laxmi [Ex. Ka-32] 33. Letter to C.M.O. regarding deceased Km. Laxmi [Ex. Ka-33] 34. Inquest Report of deceased Km. Chhoti [Ex. Ka-34] 35. Photo lash of deceased Km. Chhoti @ Guddi [Ex. Ka-35] 36. Police Paper No. 13 of deceased Km. Chhoti @ Guddi [Ex. Ka-36] 37. Specimen seal regarding deceased Km. Chhoti @ Guddi [Ex. Ka-37] 38. Letter to Reserve Inspector regarding deceased Km. Chhoti @ Guddi [Ex. Ka38] 39. Letter to C.M.O. regarding deceased Km. Chhoti @ Guddi [Ex. Ka-39] 40. Chik FIR [Ex. Ka-40] 41. Copy of general diary [Ex. Ka-41] 42. Post-mortem report of deceased Tulsi [Ex. Ka-42] 43. Post-mortem report of deceased Sangeeta [Ex. Ka-43] 44. Medical examination report of the accused [Ex. Ka-44] 15. After completion of the oral as well as documentary evidence, the statements of the accused appellant under Section 313 of the CrPC were recorded in which the accused appellant stated that he was innocent and had been falsely implicated in the alleged crime. The accused appellant took the defence that few individuals of a rival party had committed the murder of his wife and daughters as Sangeeta (deceased) was the sole eye witness to the murder of the brother of the accused appellant. The trial against the accused persons who had killed the brother of the accused appellant was pending at that point of time. The rival party wanted to terminate Sangeeta and for that reason, four individuals came to his house at about 1 o'clock in the night of 22nd of January, 2010 and mercilessly killed all his five family members and thereafter set the bodies on fire. The trial court disbelieved such defence of the accused appellant. 16. At the conclusion of the trial, the Trial Judge convicted the accused appellant for the offence under Section 302 of the IPC and sentenced him to death relying upon

Select target paragraph3

Connect to a paragraph
Connect to an entity
Disable highlights
Add to table of contents