6 On appeal by the State before the High Court, the High Court maintained the conviction of the appellant under the various provisions of the IPC, as stated above, however, in respect of the offence punishable under Section 302 IPC it modified the sentence to death. The conviction is sustained on the basis of recovery of the cell phone though from A-2, who had deposed that it is the appellant who had given him the cell phone which belonged to the deceased in lieu of the amount which was due from the appellant and payable to A-2. There is a recovery of ring and clothes as well on the disclosure statement made by the appellant. Mr. Trideep Pais, learned counsel for the appellant, strived to argue that all these recoveries cannot be believed and he sought to point out certain loopholes therein. It is not necessary to go into all these aspects. We find that, apart from the aforesaid recoveries, the samples of blood and semen of the appellant Science were taken Laboratory, and sent Mumbai, to Central along with Forensic samples of blood and semen which were recovered from the place of the incident. The DNA report conclusively concluded that these samples matched 100%, namely, the blood and the semen which were collected from the place of the incident is that of the appellant.