(22) S.C.No.463/2009 (Judgment) in (2001) 9 SCC, 362 (S.C)”. 47/­ In the light of aforesaid ratios, APP Shri Mugadiya has strongly argued that even though the panch witnesses on recovery of clothes of accused and informant and also on the recovery of rings have not supported the prosecution on some material particulars, still the evidence of investigating officer P.I.Borse is trustworthy and reliable and is self explanatory and hence his evidence cannot be ignored and thrown away only because he is a Police Officer. According to him, the cross examination of P.I.Shri Bagul, has not brought sufficient material on record to disbelieve his evidence. P.I. Shri Bagul has no grudge against accused to depose false and hence he has prayed to accept his evidence in the light of aforesaid ratios. 48/­ Learned APP Shri Mugadiya has argued that on the seized T shirt of accused Jawed at his instance, on front side, blood­stains were noticed and the C.A. Report on record makes it clear that, T shirt of accused Jawed which was on his person at the time of incident, the blood of “AB” blood group of Mansi was found. According to him, this is an incriminating circumstance against accused Jawed of which he has not given any explanation. For this purpose, learned APP Shri