36 Cri.Appeals 516, 281 n 468 of 2012.odt They should exclude every possible hypothesis except the one to be proved. v) C ou iv) rt nature and tendency. There must be a chain of evidence so complete as not to leave any reasonable ground for the conclusion consistent with the innocence of the accused and it must show that in all human ig h probability, the act must have been done by the accused and the accused alone. Keeping in view the settled law we shall examine the H 31. circumstantial evidence on which reliance is placed by the ba y prosecution. In the case on hand prosecution has relied upon the following incriminating circumstances which according to the prosecution prove the guilt of the Accused beyond reasonable (I) (a) Recovery of mobile of Mansi from Accused No.2. B om doubt. (b) Accused No.1 had given mobile to Accused No.2. (II) Recovery of simcard in the mobile of Mansi at the instance of Accused No.1. ::: Uploaded on - 08/03/2016 ::: Downloaded on - 13/03/2016 19:36:28 :::