(41)
S.C.No.463/2009 (Judgment)
Baburao Patade, Shantabai Soni, Manoj Mali, Aniket Deshpande, Shobhana Patil
and Sindhu Gore shows that the household articles were lying scattered in the house
of Mansi and Aniket and the supplementary statement given by Aniket shows that
the culprit had committed theft of his gold ring, mobile phone of Mansi and clothes
of informant and cash amount.
75/
The evidence of Medical Officer Dr. Mudalimath and Dr. Ghadge
categorically discloses as to how Mansi was murdered and at the same time it also
discloses that Mansi was raped. The P.M.Report is not disputed on behalf of accused
No.1 by name Jawed. Therefore, in the light of said P.M.Report, it can be inferred
that Mansi was raped and she was murdered and hence the death of Mansi is
homicidal one.
76/
The evidence of informant by name Aniket Deshpande discloses that
the mobile of Mansi and his gold ring & clothes were stolen from the house. It is not
disputed that at the time of filing FIR, he might be aware of that fact. However, in
the FIR he has not stated that said mobile phone, his clothes and his gold ring as
well as cash of Rs.450/ were stolen. It seems that at the time of giving
supplementary statement he has disclosed that fact.
選擇目標文字3
連接到段落
連接到實體
取消高亮顯示
新增到目錄