(60) S.C.No.463/2009 (Judgment) instance of accused Jawed can be considered and it cannot be said that the panchas turned hostile and therefore, said recovery cannot be considered. 98/­ Now coming to the fourth set of evidence adduced by the prosecution, it consists the important evidence of Dr.Mugdalimath, Dr. Hena Khan, C.A reports and DNA reports produced on record by the prosecution. 99/­ The evidence of Dr. Heena Khan as well as the evidence of I.O. Shri Borse discloses that accused was sent for medical examination by I.O. Shri Borse and at that time, the Medical Officer was requested to collect blood sample and semen sample of accused for chemical analysis and for DNA test. The evidence of Dr.Heena Khan and the certificate on record also disclose that she examined accused Jawed clinically and after his examination she noticed that accused Jawed was capable of performing sexual intercourse. It also seems that after collecting the blood and semen sample of the accused along with his pubic hair and nail clippings etc, letters were written by her to the Chemical Analyzer Aurangabad and also to the Chemical Analyzer, Forensic Science Laboratory Mumbai at Exh­84 & 85 and the samples were sent for analysis and also for DNA test. Regarding collection of