(81)
S.C.No.463/2009 (Judgment)
that imposition of fine of Rs.1000/ to each of them for the offence committed by
them would be sufficient quantum of punishment which can be awarded to them.
Hence I am of the opinion that following sentence would meet the ends of justice.
ORDER
1)
Accused by name Javedkhan @ Tingrya s/o Habidkhan is
hereby convicted under Section 235 of Cri.P.C of the offences
punishable under Sections 456,457,458,392 r/w 397, 302,376,
and 201 of IPC.
2)
While accused No.2 by name Pradip Chandalia is hereby
convicted under Section 235 of Cri.P.C of the offence punishable
under Section 411 of IPC and accused No.3 by name Ram Bodkhe
is hereby convicted under Section 235 of Cri.P.C of the offences
punishable under Sections 411 & 414 of IPC.
3)
Accused No.1 Javed is hereby convicted of the offence punishable
under Section 456 of IPC and sentenced to suffer rigorous
imprisonment for one year and to pay fine of Rs. 300/. In
default of payment of fine Rs.300/ he shall undergo Simple
Imprisonment for 10 days.
4)
Accused Javed is further convicted of the offence punishable
選擇目標文字3
連接到段落
連接到實體
取消高亮顯示
新增到目錄