Submission to the report on the protection of lawyers. The Rights Practice. December 2021
lawyers are unable to freely collect evidence on their client’s case, they are not able to provide
an adequate defence and defendants are at risk of miscarriages of justice.
Criminal defence lawyers are also restricted full access to the case file of their client and
information that may be vital to provide an adequate defence. This is especially important in
death penalty cases, where this can mean the difference between life and death. 21 As set out
in the answer to Question 1 above, lawyers have the right to access files under the Law on
Lawyers (2017), but this right can be restricted in certain cases. Lawyers are also not
permitted access to a secondary file on the case. The Judges Law (2017), Article 7, states that
judges are required to keep ‘judicial work secrets’ confidential. The 1990 Judicial Work
Secrets Regulations prohibits the disclosure of trial secrets. 22 Any violations may be
punished by Party discipline, administrative penalties and even criminal prosecution. The
definition of judicial work secrets is unclear in Chinese law but includes non-court personnel
accessing secondary files without approval of the leadership of a court.23 Chinese lawyers,
legal professionals and judges have previously called to reduce or abolish this secondary file
as it contradicts the Supreme People’s Court aims of greater judicial transparency.24
4. Please describe the role of the national bar association(s) in protecting lawyers and
the free exercise of the legal profession. Is the bar association de jure and de facto
independent from the State?
The All China Lawyers Association (ACLA) is the official professional association for
lawyers in China. It was founded in 1986, and is answerable to the Ministry of Justice. It is
not independent from the State. Chinese lawyers are obliged to be members of the local
branch of the All China Lawyers Association. The ACLA has the power, each year, to renew
lawyers’ licenses and register law firms. Lawyers and law firms must reregister annually,
leaving them vulnerable to political pressure. This system of renewal is used by judicial
authorities as a way in which to control and punish lawyers, especially lawyers that take cases
involving rights abuses and are deemed politically sensitive.
5. Please provide detailed information on the number of lawyers that have been subject
to criminal, administrative or disciplinary proceedings in the last five years for
alleged violations of standards of professional conduct. How many of them were
found guilty? How many of them were ultimately disbarred?
The Rights Practice, “Respect for Minimum Standards? Report on the Death Penalty in China”. 10 October, 2020.
https://www.rights-practice.org/news/respect-for-minimum-standards-report-on-the-death-penalty-in-china
22 The Rights Practice. “Lack of Transparency on the Death Penalty Impacts Human Rights”. March 2021.
https://www.rights-practice.org/news/lack-of-transparency-on-the-death-penalty-in-china-impacts-human-rights
23 Finder, Susan. “China's Translucent Judicial Transparency”. 18 October, 2018. in: Transparency Challenges Facing
China (2018), Peking University School of Transnational Law Research Paper, Available at SSRN:
https://ssrn.com/abstract=3344466. pp. 145
24 Ibid
21
6
選擇目標文字3
連接到段落
連接到實體
取消高亮顯示
新增到目錄