prosecuting agency by way of padding so as to fasten
the guilt of this heinous crime, on the accused
appellant and thereby lay a claim to have solved the
case.
67. Deputy
Superintendent
of
Police,
Mandar
Vasant Dharmadhikari [(PW-18), 2nd Investigating
Officer], was assigned the investigation of the case on
3rd October, 2013. He visited the place of the incident
and claims to have recovered some blood stained soil
from the second room in the watchmen chawl. The
evidence of this witness (PW-18) does not indicate as
to how he reached the conclusion that the crime had
taken place in the said room. The accused appellant
was arrested on 3rd October, 2013. Till then, there
was no material on the investigation file so as to even
cast a minimal suspicion against the accused
appellant. The Investigating Officers did not even
possess the barest evidence which could have
60
Criminal Appeal No(s). 1954-1955 of 2022
選擇目標文字3
連接到段落
連接到實體
取消高亮顯示
新增到目錄