61 Cri.Appeals 516, 281 n 468 of 2012.odt rt committed lurking house trespass with an intention to commit theft C ou and then committed rape on the victim and done her to death. 77. This takes us to the crucial task of determining the quantum of sentence. Learned counsel for Accused Jawedkhan @ Tingarya s/o Habibkhan is heard on the point of quantum of ig h sentence. Learned counsel submits that Accused Jawedkhan is 25 year old young boy. Considering his age it is submitted on behalf of Appellant Jawedkhan that it is not a rarest of rare case ba y Accused. H and Trial Court was right in not awarding capital punishment to the 78. In response to the submissions made on behalf of Appellant Jawedkhan, learned APP Mr. Sonpawale strenuously om submitted that considering the nature of offence, manner in which it was committed and its impact on the society at large it is a B rarest of rare case in which capital punishment needs to be awarded and life imprisonment would be an inadequate sentence. On the point of death sentence learned APP relied upon the following authorities: a) Bachan Singh V/s. State of Punjab1 1 (1980) 2 Supreme Court Cases 684 ::: Uploaded on - 08/03/2016 ::: Downloaded on - 13/03/2016 19:36:29 :::