25
Cri.Appeals 516, 281 n 468 of 2012.odt
rt
smothering could be possible by shutting the mouth and nostrils
C
ou
by palm.
15.
The entire evidence of Dr. Mugadalimath and
Dr.Sachin Gade is most natural and believable as Accused did not
dispute the genuineness of postmortem report and further
No.1
Jawedkhan
though
crossexamined
ig
h
Accused
Dr.Mugadalimath, could not bring on record anything adverse
16.
In addition to medical evidence, prosecution has relied
uncontroverted
inquest
panchanama
(Exhibit
31),
ba
y
upon
H
affecting the reliability of medical evidence.
photographs (Exhibits 35/1 to 35/5) of the spot taken by PW3
B
om
Baburao Sitaram Batade and spot panchanama (Exhibit 29).
17.
So far as inquest panchanama is concerned, PW32
P.I.
Borse deposed that P.S.I. Akmal had drawn inquest
Panchanama (Exhibit 31) and seized various articles from the
spot vide seizure Panchanama (Exhibit 30). Accused have not
disputed genuineness of inquest Panchanama (Exhibit 31). From
inquest panchanama it can be seen that multiple injuries were
found on the dead body of Mansi.
::: Uploaded on - 08/03/2016
::: Downloaded on - 13/03/2016 19:36:28 :::
選擇目標文字3
連接到段落
連接到實體
取消高亮顯示
新增到目錄