50 He stated that in March 2008 he had attended rt department. Cri.Appeals 516, 281 n 468 of 2012.odt C ou birthday of Aniket and offered him a gold ring weighing 5½ grams. He purchased the gold ring from the shop of R.C.Bafna at Aurangabad. He came to know that gold ring given by him to Aniket was stolen. Police called him to identify the gold ring. He given by him to Aniket. This witness was cross­examined on identification of H 55. ig h went to Police Station and identified the gold ring as the same gold ring. Damodhar stated that gold ring was containing name of ba y R.C.Bafna and white imitation stone. Despite cross­examination at length, evidence of Damodhar has remained unshaken and consistent throughout. No material omission or contradiction om could be brought in his cross­examination. The testimony of Damodhar thus inspires confidence. B 56. The next witness on recovery of gold ring is PW­29 Ashok Kesharlal Chopra, Manager working in the shop of R.C.Bafna. This witness was examined to show that PW­8 Damodhar had purchased gold ring from the shop of R.C.Bafna. PW­29 Ashok stated in his evidence that gold ring seized in the crime was having monogram of their shop. The same was sold ::: Uploaded on - 08/03/2016 ::: Downloaded on - 13/03/2016 19:36:29 :::

選擇目標文字3

連接到段落
連接到實體
取消高亮顯示
新增到目錄