[2007] 1 MLRA Krishna Rao Gurumurthi & Anor v. PP & Another Appeal 699 v. State AIR 1954 Pepsu 72). One of the cases referred to in that judgment is the case of Mamun v. Emperor AIR 1930 Lah 530. There, the statement of the accused that he had buried the dead body of the murdered person at the place pointed out by him was held to be admissible under section 27 of the Indian Evidence Act. In the case before us the statement of the appellant, 'the stolen money was kept in his room' cannot be taken as a confession of guilt. The appellant did not say that he stole the money, in which case, perhaps, that portion would be liable to be excluded from circulation. It only means 'a stolen property'. In my judgment that statement is unobjectionable. [17] So too here. The first accused statement was simply that he had thrown the body. He did not say that he had killed Balakrishnan. If the statement by the accused in Mamun v. Emperor that he had buried the dead body of the murdered person was admissible, we are unable, on the facts of the present instance to see why the first accused's statement should not be admissible. Having regard to the authorities and the facts here, the trial judge was, in our judgment, entirely correct in admitting it. [18] In the case of the second accused, he made his discovery statement to PW14 (ASP Ravinder Singh) in the course of being questioned. PW14 made a note (exh. P103) of the information provided by the second accused. The information was given in Tamil and was translated to PW14 by PW29 (Inspector Raguraman). Exh P103 reads as follows: OKT: Rajendran a/l Muthumanickam Katanya 'Saya setuju tunjukkan barang kemas yang kami ambil dari kedai emas itu, saya ada sembunyikan dalam satu beg di tempat buang grenade Ulu Kinta.' [19] In English it reads: Suspect: Rajendran a/l Muthumanickam He said 'I agree to show the jewellery we took from the shop, I hid it in a bag in at the at the place for throwing away grenades in Ulu Kinta.' [20] PW29 read back P103 in Tamil to the second accused who confirmed the contents of that exhibit and signed it. PW14 and PW29 also signed P103. PW14 then made a police report (exh. (P104) based on exh. P103. P104 reads as follows: ... semasa saya dengan dibantu oleh Insp Raguravan sedang membuat pertanyaan ke atas seorang lelaki India nama, Rajendran a/l Muthumanickam ... telah ingin menyuarakan mengenai tempat emas yang dinyorok selepas disamun oleh mereka bertiga.