上一步 2 / 3 下一步

中华人民共和国最高人民法院（2018）最高法刑核17794653... 2 of 3 https://zh.wikisource.org/wiki/%E4%B8%AD%E5%8D%8E%E4%... 本裁定自宣告之日起发生法律效力。审判长常朝晖审判员郝立珠审判员刘琳琳二〇一八年十二月二十七日书记员李香 21/03/2025, 11:00

選擇目標文字3

● ● ●

Yang Wenfu (杨文福)

案件摘要

司法管轄

中國

案件標題: Yang Wenfu’s Drug Trafficking and Transportation Case

作案時年齡: 57

作案時年齡組: 成年人 (18至59歲)

性别: 男性

犯罪時的宗教信仰: 未知

弱勢 / 邊緣群體身份

無國籍人士
社會經濟地位

司法轄區 - 地理定位

緯度: 35.8617

經度: 104.1954

司法轄區 - 地理定位 (已連結案件摘要): 中國

瑞慈合作機構

瑞慈 (英國)
瑞慈合作機構 (中國)

該國最新死刑狀態

保留死刑

案件現狀: 已結案: 已執行死刑

判處死刑年份: 2010s: 2015

執行方式: 未知

涉嫌侵犯的權利

公正審判與正當程序權利: 處罰過重或不成比例

死刑所涉罪名的性質

毒品犯罪

專家證據

法醫 / 醫學證據: 化學 / 毒理 / 毒品分析

案件背景 (最多300字): Yang Wenfu, an uneducated man of unknown nationality, was apprehended by the police along with two others while in transit. More than 14 kilograms of heroin were found in the trunk of his car. The police investigation revealed that they had been smuggling drugs from Myanmar into China through the Yunnan border. Based on physical evidence—including photographs from the scene, mobile phone communications, drug testing and weighing reports, and confessions from Yang and the co-defendants—the court found them guilty of smuggling and transporting a large quantity of drugs. Yang was identified as the principal offender, and his confession or admission of guilt was not deemed sufficient for leniency. He was initially sentenced to death on 18 September 2015. The Supreme People’s Court upheld the sentence on 27 December 2018.

辯方意見 (最多200字): The final decision by the Supreme Court did not reveal any defence arguments.

判决摘要 (最多200字): The final decision by the Supreme Court did not reveal any defence arguments.

The defendant, Yang Wenfu, colluded with others to receive heroin at the China-Myanmar border and transport it into Chinese territory. His actions constituted the crime of smuggling and transporting drugs. Given the extraordinarily large quantity of drugs involved and the extremely serious nature of the offense, he should be punished according to law. In the joint crime of drug smuggling and transportation, Yang Wenfu was identified as the principal offender and should be held accountable for the entirety of the criminal conduct in which he participated. Although he truthfully confessed to the basic facts of the crime and therefore qualifies for the circumstance of voluntary confession, this is insufficient to warrant a reduced sentence.

獲得法律代理的情況

偵查前階段: 未知
審判階段: 未知
上訴階段: 未知
第二次上訴階段: 未知

與罪名相關的立法: Article 347 (smuggling, trafficking, transporting and manufacturing drugs) of the Criminal Law of the People’s Republic of China.

案件摘要錄入狀態: 完成

案件材料語言

普通話（簡體）

該案例摘要是否已收錄？: Yes

主要文檔

中华人民共和国最高人民法院（2018）最高法刑核17794653号刑事裁定书 - 维基文库，自由的图书馆.pdf
其他
下載查看

Death Penalty Defence - Asia

選擇目標文字3

Yang Wenfu (杨文福)

主要文檔

Notifications