上一步 27 / 33 下一步

某1扎刺，足见其人身危险性极大；孙文斌在医院急诊室面对众多患者及家属和医护人员，公然持刀行凶且手段特别残忍，给患者及家属和医护人员造成极大恐慌，足见其行为的社会危害性极大，犯罪性质极其恶劣。孙文斌虽具有自首情节，但结合其犯罪的事实，犯罪的性质、情节及对于社会的危害程度，尚不足以对其从轻处罚。扣押在案的犯罪工具及其他物品应依法处理。据此，本院依照《中华人民共和国刑法》第二百三十二条、第四十八条、第五十六条第一款、第五十七条第一款、第六十七条第一款、第六十一条、第六十四条之规定，判决如下：一、被告人孙文斌犯故意杀人罪，判处死刑，剥夺政治权利终身。二、扣押在案的尖刀一把予以没收；手机一部发还被告人亲属；其他物品留档备查（清单附后）。如不服本判决，可在接到判决书的第二日起十日内，通过本院或者直接向北京市高级人民法院提出上诉。书面上诉的，应当提交上诉状正本一份、副本二份。审判长冯桢审判员汤笑然 27

選擇目標文字3

● ● ●

Sun Wenbin (孙文斌）

案件摘要

司法管轄

中國

國籍

中國人

案件標題: Sun Wenbin Murder Case (2020）京03刑初9号刑事判决书)

作案時年齡: 55

作案時年齡組: 成年人 (18至59歲)

性别: 男性

犯罪時的宗教信仰: 未知

弱勢 / 邊緣群體身份

社會經濟地位

司法轄區 - 地理定位

緯度: 35.8617

經度: 104.1954

司法轄區 - 地理定位 (已連結案件摘要): 中國

瑞慈合作機構

瑞慈 (英國)
瑞慈合作機構 (中國)

該國最新死刑狀態

保留死刑

案件現狀: 已結案: 已執行死刑

判處死刑年份: 2020s: 2020

執行方式: 未知

涉嫌侵犯的權利

公正審判與正當程序權利: 在各階段獲得充分法律代理的權利

死刑所涉罪名的性質

謀殺: 一名受害者

專家證據

法醫 / 醫學證據: DNA / 血清學 / 生物學
法醫 / 醫學證據: 屍檢 / 死後檢驗
法醫 / 醫學證據: 指紋 / 掌紋 / 足跡
法醫 / 醫學證據: 血跡模式分析
法醫 / 醫學證據: 醫學檢查（被害人 / 被告，年齡鑑定等）

案件背景 (最多300字): (This case brief is based on the publicly available first-instance verdict, as China's judicial system has not disclosed the appeal and final verdict. ) Defendant Sun Wenbin, a middle school graduate, was unemployed. On December 4, 2019, Sun's 95-year-old mother was taken to hospital for emergency treatment. Her condition remained unmoved, and Sun blamed her worsening health on Dr. Yang’s treatment. On December 24, Sun held hostage of Yang with a knife prepared beforehand in the emergency room. He hen repeatedly slashed and stabbed her neck. After Yang fell to the ground, Sun ignored attempts by others to stop him and continued his attack, ultimately causing Yang’s death. Sun called the police immediately and surrendered. Following deliberation by a panel of judges and review by the adjudication committee, Sun was tried on January 16, 2020—24 days after the incident. The court convicted him of murder and sentenced him to death. His appeal failed, and the Supreme People's Court approved the death penalty. On April 3, Sun was executed. Policy Context: Tensions between doctors and patients in China are deeply rooted, with violent attacks against medical staff frequently reported. This brutal case sparked widespread public debate. Shortly after, multiple state departments jointly issued a memorandum on punishing those disrupting medical order. Since 2014, the Supreme People's Court and Procuratorate have issued polices, and introduced a series of guidance cases cases of violence against medical staff, emphasizing death sentences when warranted. In early 2020, three convicted murderers of doctors were executed, and between 2011 and 2021, at least 13 death sentences were publicly reported. The Supreme People's Court's 2020 Annual Report highlight this case and reaffirmed its tough stance on such violence.

辯方意見 (最多200字)

The defendant’s lawyer was appointed as per Chinese law, which mandates that defendants facing potential death sentences must have a defense lawyer assigned if they have not retained one themselves. The defence lawyer’s arguments were as follows:

Sun called the police within three minutes of committing the crime and waited at the scene. After being apprehended, he fully confessed to the crime, which qualifies as voluntary surrender.
Sun admitted guilt, accepted punishment, and was a first-time offender.
Sun had a deep emotional bond with his mother, whose condition repeatedly worsened during hospitalization. Believing the doctors failed to treat her according to his requests, Sun lost control in a moment of distress and committed the crime. The defense requested a lenient sentence.律师为指定辩护律师。按照中国法律规定，可能被判处死刑的被告人，如果没有委托律师，法院应当为其指定辩护律师。辩护律师意见：
孙作案后三分钟即拨打波讲电话，并在案犯现场等待，归案后对犯罪事实供认不讳，属于自首。
孙某认罪认罚且为初犯。
孙某与其母亲情感深厚，其母住院期间病情反复，孙某认为医生未按其要求治疗，情急之下丧失理智而事实犯罪行为，请求法院从轻处罚。

判决摘要 (最多200字)

The evidence failed to prove that Dr. Yang prescribed inappropriate medication to Sun's mother or that the hospital's treatment plan was unreasonable. The court rejected Sun's defense on this basis.
Sun falsely believed that the medication was inappropriate and premeditated an act of revenge against the doctor, even while his mother was still receiving treatment at the hospital. The court also rejected the defense that Sun's emotional instability and irrational behavior were caused by his worry over his mother's critical condition due to her advanced age.
Sun's act of calling the police to surrender was recognised as voluntary surrender.
Sun developed resentment and murderous intent due to his dissatisfaction with the medical treatment. He prepared tools in advance, demonstrating deep malice. During the offence, he repeatedly slashed Dr. Yang's neck, and even after Dr. Yang collapsed and was incapable of resisting, Sun ignored attempts by others to stop him and continued stabbing. This showed extreme personal danger. Sun committed the crime openly in a hospital, wielding a knife in front of numerous patients' families and medical staff. His brutal actions caused widespread panic among patients’ families and medical staff, creating severe social harm. The crime was extremely heinous. Although Sun's voluntary surrender was acknowledged, given the facts, nature, circumstances of the crime, and its harm to society, it was insufficient for leniency. Thus, the defendant Sun Wenbin was convicted of intentional homicide, sentenced to death, and deprived of political rights for life.1. 证据无法证明杨某对孙某母亲用药失当或医院的诊疗方案不合理，孙某以此辩解法院不予采纳；
孙某自以为用药失当，预谋对医生进行报复，切作案时其母亲仍在该医院接受治疗。关于孙某因担忧母亲高龄病危而情绪波动丧失理智的辩护意见，不予采纳。
孙某报警投案应认定为自首。
孙某因不认同治疗方案，心生怨恨，产生杀害意图，预先准备工具，可见主观恶性极深作案时反复切割杨某颈部，在杨某到底丧失反抗能力的情况下，仍不顾他人阻拦，反复扎刺，人身危险性极大；孙某面对众多患者家属和医护人员，公然在医院持刀行凶且手段残忍，给病人家属和医护人员造成极大恐慌，其行为的社会危害性极大，犯罪性质极其恶劣。孙有自首情节，但结合犯罪事实、性质、情节及对社会的危害程度，尚不足以对其从轻处罚。因此，被告人孙文斌犯故意杀人罪，判处死刑，剥夺政治权利终身。

獲得法律代理的情況