Mohan M. Shantanagoudar speaking for himself, Justice
N.V. Ramana (as he then was) and Justice Indira
Banerjee, set aside the conviction and sentence of the
appellant therein and as the appellant therein had already
undergone almost six years’ incarceration but had been
released on bail, the bail bonds were discharged and all
proceedings against the appellant were declared to have
terminated.
27. In the aforesaid case, the appellant had not taken the
plea of juvenility before the Trial Court, however, such plea
was raised before the High Court but the same was
rejected. However, this Court got an inquiry conducted by
the Registrar (Judicial) of this Court who found him to be
aged less than 18 years. The judgment in this case mainly
dealt with the issue as to whether the report of Registrar
(Judicial) of this Court could be accepted over and above
the finding of the High Court which was different. The
judgment proceeds to deal with this issue and ultimately
comes to the conclusion that this could be done provided
31
選擇目標文字3
連接到段落
連接到實體
取消高亮顯示
新增到目錄