approved, then the appellant would be declared to be a
child which may then entail necessary consequences as
per the 2015 Act. It would be relevant to note here that
no objection has been filed by the respondent-State to the
report submitted by the Trial Court. The only submission
advanced on behalf of the respondent-State is for getting
the ossification test conducted.
9.
We have perused the report and also the material
evidence led before the Trial Court on the basis of which
the conclusion has been drawn by the Trial Court. The
report is based upon documentary evidence as also oral
evidence of the present head-mistress (IW-01), the retired
headmaster
(IW-08),
five
teachers
of
the
primary
institution (IW-02, IW-04, IW-07, IW-09 and IW-10) and
also the guardian of the appellant (IW-06). It would also
be pertinent to notice that the institution is not a private
institution but is a government primary school and this
Court does not find any reason to dis-believe or even doubt
the testimony of government servants both working and
7
選擇目標文字3
連接到段落
連接到實體
取消高亮顯示
新增到目錄