上一步 35 / 35 下一步

35 …………………………………………,J. [J.B. PARDIWALA] …………………………………………,J. [SANJAY KUMAR] NEW DELHI SEPTEMBER 21, 2023.

選擇目標文字3

● ● ●

Rajesh Yadav

案件摘要

司法管轄

印度

國籍

印度人

案件標題: Rajesh and Ors v. State of Madhya Pradesh

作案時年齡: 18

作案時年齡組: 成年人 (18至59歲)

性别: 男性

犯罪時的宗教信仰: 印度教

司法轄區 - 地理定位

緯度: 20.5937

經度: 78.9629

司法轄區 - 地理定位 (已連結案件摘要): 印度

瑞慈合作機構

The Square Circle Clinic (印度)

該國最新死刑狀態

保留死刑

案件現狀: 已結案: 無罪釋放

判處死刑年份: 2010s: 2016

執行方式: 絞刑

涉嫌侵犯的權利

公正審判與正當程序權利: 公正調查與信息披露

死刑所涉罪名的性質

謀殺: 一名受害者
綁架勒索

專家證據

法醫 / 醫學證據: DNA / 血清學 / 生物學
法醫 / 醫學證據: 屍檢 / 死後檢驗

案件背景 (最多300字): The case against the accused is for brutally injuring and killing a minor girl, of seven years, after a duration of subjecting her to cruelty, beating and harassment. The circumstances against the accused are: DNA report; postmortem report (which detailed evidence of injuries across the body); medical opinion (suggesting cause of death due to asphyxia and a history of injuries and possible sexual assault). The Supreme Court, on appeal, confirmed the conviction and sentences but altered the conviction under Section 302 to one under Section 325, setting aside the death penalty and imposing a sentence of rigorous imprisonment for seven years, on 6.09.2018.

辯方意見 (最多200字): The judgment did not record any defence arguments.

判决摘要 (最多200字): Medical Expert Evidence: On an assessment of evidence available and testimonies heard, the court held that none of the injuries could reasonably lead the Court to conclude that the said injuries could have caused “asphyxia as a result of aspiration of gastric content in the air passage”, and the injuries which were caused by the accused on the day of the incident were either on the skull or the hand or the thumb and therefore could not have been the reason for which death had occurred as testified by the prosecution’s medical expert. Thus, since the liability of the accused for the commission of the offence would remain in serious doubt, the benefit of which must go in favour of the accused.

獲得法律代理的情況

第二次上訴階段: 公益律師
上訴階段: 未知
審判階段: 未知
偵查前階段: 未知

與罪名相關的立法: Sections 302, 376(2)(f), 377 – Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC)

司法判例: Kamta Tiwari vs. State of Madhya Pradesh

案件摘要錄入狀態: 完成

案件材料語言

印地語
英語

該案例摘要是否已收錄？: Yes

主要文檔

Rajesh_SC Judgment.pdf
English
下載查看

已同步模板

pdf

Rajesh_HC Judgment.pdf234.41 kB

pdf

Rajesh_TC Judgment.pdf293.7 kB

Death Penalty Defence - Asia

選擇目標文字3

Rajesh Yadav

主要文檔

已同步模板

Notifications