70. The FSL report22 and the DNA Analysis Report23 did not result in any positive finding regarding the presence of human blood or semen on the clothing and other articles seized at the instance of the accused appellant. The remained inconclusive DNA does analysis not report implicate the accused appellant. Neither the trial Court nor the High Court placed reliance on these reports for recording a finding against the accused appellant. 71. The only so-called incriminating scientific report (Exh. 105) against the accused appellant was pertaining to the comparison of the soil/mud on the sole of the pair of shoes recovered at the instance of the accused appellant and the specimen soil recovered from the pond where the dead body of the child victim was found. The said report was exhibited 22 Exh. 104. 23 Supra note 10. 63 Criminal Appeal No(s). 1954-1955 of 2022