have not forwarded immediately.” him for examination (Emphasis supplied) 65. Thus, the witness (PW-18) affirms the fact that the witnesses of the last seen theory who were residing in the transit camp did not step forward to disclose to the police that they had seen the deceased girl with the accused appellant. Neither of the two Investigating Officers uttered a word regarding the witness Anil Mahatam Singh (PW-17) coming forward and disclosing that the accused appellant had made an extra-judicial confession in his presence. 66. Thus, upon an overall appreciation of the evidence of the two Investigating Officers and the witnesses of the last seen theory and so also the sole witness of extra-judicial confession, we are convinced that the entire sequence of events narrated by these witnesses is unreliable and unbelievable. It is clearly a case of concocted depositions secured by the 59 Criminal Appeal No(s). 1954-1955 of 2022

選擇目標文字3

連接到段落
連接到實體
取消高亮顯示
新增到目錄