10. The accused appellant was arrested on 3rd
October 2013, vide arrest panchnama9 and he was
subjected to medical examination. The Medical
Officer (PW-10) of the Civil Hospital, Thane, found an
abrasion on the foreskin of the penis of the accused
appellant. The prosecution has tried to link the said
injury with the crime, claiming that the injury may
have been received when the accused appellant had
sexually assaulted the child victim.
11. On the pointing out of the accused appellant,
the
Investigating
Officer,
Mandar
Vasant
Dharmadhikari (PW-18) claims to have visited room
No. 2 (place of incident) and room No. 4 of the
watchmen chawl, in which the accused appellant
used to reside. A few articles were recovered and
seized from room No. 4, to be specific, the lungi,
baniyan, the watchman’s dress and the shoes of the
9 Exh. 82.
8
Criminal Appeal No(s). 1954-1955 of 2022
選擇目標文字3
連接到段落
連接到實體
取消高亮顯示
新增到目錄