35 Hari Om and his associates had committed the murders and also told them that he had witnessed the incident. However, the FIR lodged by PW1 Kotwal Singh spoke otherwise. According to the reporting, the accused were unknown persons. The reporting also did not disclose that PW5 Ujjwal had survived, despite being attempted to be murdered, and that he had witnessed the incident. As a matter of fact the FIR did not make any reference to PW5 Ujjwal. iii) According to PW5 Ujjwal, he had narrated the entire incident to PW4 Shankar Lal (milkman) and Darogaji. On this score also, the record spoke otherwise, according to which, till 29.10.2008 the names of Hari Om and his associates had not surfaced as suspects at all. The initial registration of crime was against unknown persons. iv) There are other inconsistencies and omissions with regard to the manner in which his siblings were done to death. (C) Apart from the aspects referred to hereinabove touching upon the comparison of the version given in court, as against his statement recorded

選擇目標文字3

連接到段落
連接到實體
取消高亮顯示
新增到目錄