上一步 37 / 37 下一步

:`...?.`. +CATATAN: I-Salinan Putusan Pengadilan 140ffid.B/2002ffN.TNG., tanggal Negeri 20 Mei Tangerang, 2002, atas No. nana Terdakwa hffiRRI UTAMI binti SISWANDI, telali disesuaikan dengan aslinya pada tanggal 30 Juni 2006 untuk keperluan Dinas ; Tangerang, 30 Juni 2006 a.n. RETUA PENGADILAN NEGERI TANGERAN G PANITERA / SEKRETARIS

選擇目標文字3

● ● ●

Muhammad Nur Ismail alias Malik Bin Ismail

案件摘要

司法管轄

印度尼西亚

國籍

印度尼西亚人

案件標題: Muhammad Nur Ismail alias Malik Bin Ismail

作案時年齡: 28

作案時年齡組: 成年人 (18至59歲)

性别: 女性

犯罪時的宗教信仰: 其他

司法轄區 - 地理定位

緯度: -6.293782809685137

經度: 106.84001863002779

司法轄區 - 地理定位 (已連結案件摘要): 印度尼西亚

瑞慈合作機構

Institute for Criminal Justice and Reform (印度尼西亞)

該國最新死刑狀態

保留死刑

案件現狀: 進行中: 重新量刑

判處死刑年份: 2000s: 2002

執行方式: 槍決/射擊: 行刑隊槍決

涉嫌侵犯的權利

公正審判與正當程序權利: 公正調查與信息披露
公正審判與正當程序權利: 處罰過重或不成比例
酷刑: 酷刑/殘忍、不人道或有辱人格的待遇或處罰（CIDT

死刑所涉罪名的性質

毒品犯罪

案件背景 (最多300字): Muhammad Nur Ismail alias Malik Bin Ismail is an Indonesian citizen who was arrested by members of the Police on December 12, 2008 after carrying out a marijuana buying and selling transaction in which the marijuana was to be transported from Banda Aceh to be sent to the Cikampek area. The defendant was sentenced to life imprisonment in the court of first instance, while at the appeal level he was sentenced to 20 years in prison, and life imprisonment.

辯方意見 (最多200字): In the process of filing a judicial review, Muhammad Nur Ismail's legal counsel alleged claims of torture committed by investigators during the interrogation, and that Muhammad Nur Ismail was not accompanied by legal counsel. Every time Muhammad Nur Ismail answered the investigator's questions with responses that did not align with the investigator's expectations, the investigator in question would immediately strike Muhammad Nur Ismail’s body with his hands and a large black electrical cable. This repeated action occurred every time Muhammad Nur Ismail was interrogated by the investigator, until Muhammad Nur Ismail surrendered and was forced to follow the investigator’s will because he could not bear and endure the suffering.

判决摘要 (最多200字): The defendant submitted a second PK application but none of them were accepted by the panel of judges on the grounds that they did not meet the formal requirements. This is because there is a Supreme Court Circular Letter (SEMA) Number 7 of 2014 concerning the Submission of Applications for Review in Criminal Cases which limits the application for review which can only be submitted once even though the previous Constitutional Court Decision Number 34/PUU-XI/2013 previously allowed the submission of a review application more than once. In fact, the Supreme Court Circular Letter (SEMA) Number 10 of 2009 concerning the Submission of Review mandates all district courts not to forward the submission of the second or more PK application file of the convict to the Supreme Court.

獲得法律代理的情況

偵查前階段: 未知
第二次上訴階段: 未知
審判階段: 私人律師
上訴階段: 私人律師

與罪名相關的立法: The Law No. 22 of 1997 on Narcotics

案件摘要錄入狀態: 進行中

案件材料語言

印度尼西亞語

主要文檔

First Instance Judgement - Merri Utami
Indonesian
下載查看
Appeal Judgment - Merri Utami
Indonesian
下載查看
Case Review Judgement - Merri Utami
Indonesian
下載查看
Cassation Judgement - Merri Utami
Indonesian
下載查看

Death Penalty Defence - Asia

選擇目標文字3

Muhammad Nur Ismail alias Malik Bin Ismail

主要文檔

Notifications